Becoming Three

April 17, 2008

Correspondences

Filed under: Musings — Marcy @ 8:10 am
Tags:

A while back ama wrote about not answering the phone, not returning calls or emails or letters, and so on.

She is the kind of person who can say, apparently with no concern or doubt whatsoever, “people can love you without replying to your emails.”

I know there are people like this out there. She’s one. And some of my friends are, too.

Me, I’m the jealous, paranoid, faithless, bitter type.

If you don’t answer your phone (there are two of you I am thinking of), I am hurt and offended. What, is your homeschooling or nap or whatever you do all day long so important that you don’t want to talk to me? (Tongue in cheek, sort of.) It makes spontaneity impossible. And at least one of you used to call me spontaneously in the morning, saying, hey, let’s go to South Bend, or Valparaiso, or…

I hate the phone to begin with. And it’s adding insult to have to face your machine every time.

And if you don’t answer your phone, could you at least think about returning the call at the earliest chance? When I call inviting you to lunch, it would be nice to know by lunchtime at least that you can’t come, but maybe, since you’re my friend, you appreciated the invitation?

You have no idea how hard it is for me to take the initiative and plan something social. I’m not that brave most of the time. So it’s usually spontaneous or nothing. And that means pretty much it’s nothing. (I’m working on it, people. It’s just hard. I’ve never been good at picking up on social cues, and so I err on the negative side, assuming that if people don’t talk to me, they don’t like me.)

I’ve given up on Christmas cards, because I can’t fathom how it can be sufficient to send one newsletter each year and feel connected with your friends. A few times I tried to reconnect by writing a letter in response to a newsletter. No answers. All you want, you newsletter people, is to do your bit and be done with it. You apparently don’t want any more conversation. That doesn’t count as friendship, to me. (Except I, too, have a few people I am content to have very infrequent contact with; I guess we all prioritize our friends that way?)

I’m not sure if any of my (met in real life) friends read my blog, at least not regularly. That’s fine, there’s no obligation. But I read my friends’ blogs, those two who have them, as consistently as they post. I wish all my friends blogged. And read blogs.

So, if you are one of those people who thinks warm thoughts about your friends when you read their blog, or their email or letter, or listen to their phone message, or just when something reminds you of them, but feel no need to tell them about it, or at least other things push that desire out of the living possibilities, which, really, theoretically, I understand and appreciate, this post is just to let you know that your friends may not be as faithful, as constant, as generous as you are; they may be like me instead.

Have mercy on our weakness — speak to us.

6 Comments »

  1. AW~I used to be just like ya! and then I had four kids. I remember I had a friend once that scheduled me in for a literal, twenty-minute visit. OH was I OFFENDED! She has six kids, and now I understand. I am unable to keep afloat sometimes and constantly live in a state of feeling overwhelmed.

    I still don’t wanna schedule twenty-minute visits, but I am able to be loved from afar now. It takes me FOREVER to get out a letter or thank you now. There are just SOOO MANY PEOPLE I wanna encourage~and sometimes I do it to the expense of the ones within my own four walls, and I can’t do it all. (((((HUGS))))) sandi

    Comment by (((((HUGS))))) sandi — April 18, 2008 @ 5:59 pm | Reply

  2. I read this and thought to myself…that person sounds like ME!!!! when people take the time to comment on my blog, give me gifts at Christmas, birthday, anniversaries, etc. I really make an effort to thank them…. anyway, I saw you stopped by my “I also live on a farm” blog and left a comment…thank you! As I’ve gotten to understand myself better I think some of this desire you feel to stay “connected” to others is hard wired in your soul…it flows from the same place where your interest in music flows… when you have a second read this post on friendship from my other blog and see what you think: http://hearttoheart.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/thoughts-on-friendship-by-ralph-waldo-emerson/

    Comment by DM — April 24, 2008 @ 4:15 pm | Reply

  3. It’s funny — I can write a post like this thinking I mean it in very general terms, and yet I find I have specific relationships in mind. Rereading it just now, I realize there are people in my life I must keep at some distance — I like them and don’t want to have no relationship at all, but for a variety of reasons I feel the need for more space with these folks.

    This is one of the things I think is crazy about friendship — how rarely it seems two people desire the same level from one another. I don’t think it’s possible to define friendship once for all. I think there are various levels and intimacies, many of which “count” as friendship. What Emerson seems to be talking about, and what I crave in my post, is only for a select few — none of us can have a multitude of such costly / rich friendships.

    And yes, about things that are hard-wired. It’s an intensity thing — yearnings and fearings both are subject to my general intensity. Even my apathy is subject to intensity, lol.

    Comment by Marcy — April 24, 2008 @ 8:23 pm | Reply

  4. just getting around to this, which, i suppose, proves that i am indeed as fickle a friend as i say i am (bitter-wry smile).

    Me, I’m the jealous, paranoid, faithless, bitter type.

    me, too! but i must say that being so limited, being so unable (not unwilling!) to keep up regularly with others, finding this in myself, has helped me tremendously in understanding, accepting, and forgiving it in others. i am, in fact, regularly stunned at how people take my non-answers and silences in amazing stride, and keep on leaving (unreturned) messages and (unreturned) emails in my various technological devices, acting PLEASED rather than miffed when i finally pick up the phone or fire up the email and reply.

    i used to be the most punctually communicative friend! and i used to get absolute furious at people who failed me in this respect. then things happened — chronic fatigue, psychic disarray — and i stopped being a punctually communicative person. by developing this horrible failing, i learned to accept it in other people. this is the way it works. always. thank god for our failings. we would be a merciless kind if we didn’t have them.

    at night, i lie in bed thinking of all the people i have been neglecting. i say a hail mary for them and put them in the heart of god. i tell god to make them feel the warmth i cannot give them. i ask god to forgive me. i ask god to make these people’s lives better and richer than i would if i called them or kept up with them regularly. trust me, marcy: i don’t go about it light-heartedly.

    many hugs to you.

    Comment by ama — April 28, 2008 @ 8:05 pm | Reply

  5. This is one of the things I think is crazy about friendship — how rarely it seems two people desire the same level from one another.

    mismatched needs, expectations, and desires are one of the biggest tragedies of communal human existence, hence of human existence tout court.

    Comment by ama — April 28, 2008 @ 8:07 pm | Reply

  6. Argh.

    Comment by Marcy — April 28, 2008 @ 9:27 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.